enfr

talk
to us

New York
250 Park Avenue,
14th Floor New York City, NY 10177

Connecticut
22 Thorndal Circle,
3rd Floor Darien, CT 06820

Paris
23 rue du Mail
75002 Paris – France

info@beperpetual.com
Attributes of the t3 framework:
the right stuff

The "right stuff" is about ensuring the right people are in place and ready to deliver. They feel strongly that they are working with a group of people they respect and can get the job done. The foundation of any team are the people who comprise it. The needs of any team go far beyond ensuring they "can do" the job itself (competence) and extend to areas that allow the team, and its individual members, to work effectively together in delivering the desired outcomes.

These include, for example, possessing a growth mindset, allowing people to adapt more effectively to adversity and solve problems that lead to a breakthrough (‘can do’ attitude). Openness to other’s ideas (a true team player), grit and positivity are other examples of traits of people that are important on any team.

Simply put, members of the team "can do, can do".

clarity & alignment

People and teams are clear on what they need to do and why it is important. High-performing team feel strongly that the direction is clear, and line-of-sight exists between their work and that of the teams or organization on the whole.

There is clarity in the vision, mission and objectives of the team and clarity in how such objectives cascade down to each and every member within it.

Clarity is nothing without alignment, at least over the longer-term. People who know what to do can certainly deliver some good results, within their own sphere of influence; however, alignment is vital for sustained execution excellence. Alignment suggests that people are committed to their role and what they need to do to produce good results.

Simply put, members of the team "know what to do."

empowerment

Empowerment is all about ensuring people have the freedom, support, and tools to deliver on what is expected along with the systems and process to work effectively together.

The nature of the way organizations are designed and the likelihood that most are populated by human beings leads to a natural dysfunction that often is referred to as silo thinking or behavior. Left alone, silo behavior and potentially relational-based conflict WILL arise. This calls for organizations to install a ritual that ensure these are outlined, clarified, and negotiated so that people can work effectively together in driving value for their customers, and the business.

Additionally, we find many teams that have too many priorities that are crippling the team’s effectiveness and/or leading to burnout. Typically, ad hoc demands from the business may be the culprit, and without a priority reconciliation process, frustration emerges.

Simply put, members of the team are "allowed and enabled to".

belonging

Belonging suggests that people fit within your organizational context—they "belong" here and are connected to the organization.

Organizations cannot afford to have disengaged employees—and yet, many in the workforce report being actively disengaged. Others are passively disengagement manifesting in some form of "quiet quitting." This results in lost productivity and an unhappy workplace in general.

While there are many factors that may be at play here, the most important one is a sense of connection people have with their company, a belief that they (the company) are doing the right thing (beyond making money) and that they are operating in a way that is consistent with making a real contribution to society. For newer generations of workers this is of particular importance. It all starts with purpose and values.

Simply put, members of the team "believe it's right to do".

agile execution

Agile Execution is all about how the team works together to adapt to dynamic conditions. It is our belief that no initial plan will survive for very long, placing a burden on the team to pivot consistently in order to deliver upon their strategic outcomes.

In today’s VUCA world, planning is taking on new forms as organizations recognize that within weeks after initiating any plan, it can be rendered, at worst case, useless, or in best case, intentions remain on track but how one gets there changes rapidly. The environment is simply too dynamic to invest months preparing, planning, and budgeting for a reality that may not exist in six months.

In our view, get the strategic intent right, plan on how to get there, and instill agile execution rituals that allow the team to adapt to the realities of executing against the plan.

Simply put, members of the team "will do what it takes with integrity".

togetherness

A sense of togetherness results when the teams do the other five attributes well, leading to sustained high-performance and lots of enjoyment working with fellow colleagues. No matter how remote a team may operate, leaders need to work to secure this sense of "togetherness" and, ideally, bring people together every so often.

In such teams, not only do you have exemplary engagement and behaviors from all constituent members but that final piece of "social glue" -- individuals motivated also by the very company of their team colleagues. This is the zone where intra-relationships are defined by shared levels of high professional respect and, indeed, deep friendships.

Team members bearing this attribute scale even greater heights (sometimes literally!) because not only are they passionate about what they do (as built on all the preceding qualities) but it is this comradeship that sits at the very nexus of this passion. There is no place they would rather be than with the companionship of their comrades and, with this fellowship, a sense of collective invincibility. For such teams, there is a mindset of "anything together".

Simply put, members of the team "build a legacy".

organizational health

ALIGNMENT: the engine of organizational success

back to all insights organizational health
Avatar photo

Steve Morrissey

Ask any leader what makes a team succeed, and you’ll likely hear the same answers: talent, resources, strategy. Rarely does the answer come quickly – alignment. Yet of all the attributes that separate high-performing organizations from the rest, alignment may be the most powerful and the most underestimated.

At Perpetual, our t3® diagnostic framework assesses team and organizational health across a set of defining attributes. Alignment – the second attribute – sits at the heart of this model. It is the invisible architecture that determines whether a strategy lives on a slide deck or actually moves through an organization and gets executed. Without it, even the most talented teams operate at a fraction of their potential.

That is the alignment question. And in our experience working with consumer brands and leadership teams across the US and EU, the answer is far more often ‘not powerfully enough’ than leaders care to admit.

what alignment actually means

Alignment is not simply about everyone knowing the company’s mission statement. In the context of organizational health, alignment means uniting every level of a company – from frontline staff to the C-suite – so that goals, values, and strategies move in sync. It eliminates departmental silos, reduces confusion, and ensures that every action directly drives the company’s shared mission.

This is the strategic cascade: the process by which a vision set at the top of an organization is translated – clearly, compellingly, and consistently – into the daily behaviors and decisions of every individual within it. When the cascade works, everything moves together. When it breaks, you get fragmentation, duplicated effort, misaligned priorities, and a workforce that is busy but not necessarily productive.

In practice, alignment operates at three levels:

  • Individual alignment: Each person understands their personal objectives, knows how to succeed in their role, and can see how their work connects to the broader strategy.
  • Team alignment: The team is clear on its collective role in supporting organizational strategy, with shared accountability and a coherent way of working.
  • Organizational alignment: The vision, strategy, and plan are compelling, well understood, and consistently communicated across every level and function.

the alignment questions – and why they matter

When we run the t3® diagnostic with leadership teams and organizations, alignment surfaces through a specific set of questions. These are not abstract. They are precise, deliberate, and designed to reveal where the cascade is working – and where it has broken down:

  • My individual goals and objectives are clear to me – I know what I have to do to be successful.
  • I know how I am progressing on my individual goals and objectives.
  • Members of this team are very clear on our role in support of the strategy.
  • This organization has a clear overall vision, strategy, and plan to achieve success.
  • Our strategy is compelling and differentiated, giving us a clear chance to achieve our ambitions.
  • The vision and strategy are well understood throughout the organization.
  • People throughout our organization are clear on their role in executing against our strategy.

These seven questions tell you everything. They move from the individual to the team to the enterprise – a diagnostic journey through the cascade itself. When scores are strong across all seven, you typically find organizations that execute at pace, retain talent, and consistently outperform. When they are weak – particularly at the individual or team level – you find frustration, disengagement, and leaders who are perplexed by why their perfectly crafted strategy isn’t gaining traction.

The most common misalignment pattern we see is a strong top-level response to the vision and strategy questions, paired with weak scores on individual clarity and progression. Leaders believe the strategy is clear. Their people don’t know how it connects to what they do every day. The cascade has stalled – usually somewhere in the middle of the organization.

the business case for alignment

The data on alignment is unambiguous. Research consistently shows that organizations that communicate a clear and compelling vision for the future are over four times more likely to be organizationally healthy than those that don’t. That is not a marginal gain – it is a structural advantage.

When teams are fully aligned, performance improves across every dimension that matters to a business: speed of decision-making, quality of execution, employee engagement, customer satisfaction, and commercial outcomes. People move faster because they are not waiting for clarity. They make better decisions because they understand what the organization is trying to achieve. They collaborate more effectively because they trust that everyone is pulling in the same direction.

There is also a retention dynamic at play. Talented people leave organizations when they feel their work is disconnected from something meaningful. Alignment provides that connection. It answers the question every high performer is asking, whether consciously or not: does what I do here actually matter? When the answer is yes, and when people can see it clearly, engagement and commitment follow.

the cascade in practice: from vision to individual

Building genuine alignment is not a communications exercise – it is a leadership discipline. It requires three things done consistently and well:

  • A clear, compelling vision. Not a corporate platitude. A genuine articulation of where the organization is going and why it matters – one that resonates emotionally as well as logically, and that gives people a reason to get behind it.
  • A defined roadmap. The vision must be brought to life with a well-defined path that shows how you will get there. Strategic priorities must be set, sequenced, and communicated with clarity. People need to see the route, not just the destination.
  • Individual line-of-sight. Every person in the organization should be able to draw a straight line from their daily work to the strategic objectives. This is where alignment most often fails. The translation from strategy to individual goals is frequently left to chance.

Effective direction-setting communicates with clarity and resonates at every level of the organization. It sets strategic priorities in a way that inspires action rather than passive acknowledgement. And it creates the conditions for people to understand – genuinely understand – the role they play in making the vision a reality.

In our work with consumer brands and leadership teams, we see this come to life most powerfully when leaders make the strategy personal. Not just ‘here is our plan’ but ‘here is how your team fits into it – and here is what success looks like for you, specifically.’ That act of translation – from enterprise strategy to team priority to individual objective – is where alignment either crystallizes or collapses.

alignment and team health – an inseparable relationship

The t3® framework treats team health as a precondition for organizational performance. And within that model, alignment and team health are inseparable. A team that is misaligned – unclear on its role, unsure of its priorities, disconnected from the broader strategy – will underperform regardless of its talent.

The most resilient, high-performing teams we work with share a common characteristic: they know exactly what they are trying to achieve, why it matters, and what each member brings to the effort. There is no ambiguity about direction. There is no confusion about individual accountability. And there is no gap between what leadership believes is understood and what the team actually understands.

That gap – the space between what leaders think they have communicated and what has actually landed – is where most alignment failures live. Closing it requires deliberate, ongoing effort. Town halls, all-hands meetings, and strategy decks are not enough on their own. Alignment is built through consistent conversation, through managers who can connect the enterprise agenda to the team’s day-to-day, and through a culture in which asking ‘how does this connect to our strategy?’ is the norm rather than the exception.

building alignment as a leadership practice

If your t3® diagnostic reveals alignment gaps – and in most organizations, it will – the following are the highest-leverage interventions:

  • Strategy on a page: Translate the full strategic plan into a single, clear, accessible document that every person in the organization can understand. Not a summary deck – a genuine, usable articulation of direction, priorities, and success measures.
  • Roles and responsibilities framework: Clarify how each team and function connects to the strategy. Define not just what people do, but what they are accountable for driving at an organizational level.
  • North Star statement and team charter: Give teams a shared articulation of purpose and a set of commitments that connect them to the broader mission.
  • Cascading goal-setting: Ensure that individual objectives are explicitly linked to team and organizational priorities – visible, tracked, and revisited regularly.

These are not one-time exercises. Alignment is dynamic. Strategies evolve, markets shift, teams change. Leaders who treat alignment as a destination rather than a practice will find themselves back at the beginning every time their organization faces disruption or change.

conclusion: alignment is a competitive advantage

In the race to build high-performing organizations, leaders often look for the sophisticated answer – the complex framework, the cutting-edge operating model, the transformational initiative. Alignment is none of those things. It is, in some ways, deceptively simple: make sure everyone knows where you’re going, why it matters, and what their role is in getting there.

But simple is not the same as easy. Alignment requires consistent leadership, clear communication, and the discipline to keep translating strategy into action at every level of the organization. It requires leaders to be honest about where the cascade has broken down and deliberate about rebuilding it.

When it works – when every individual, every team, and every function is genuinely aligned around a clear and compelling direction – the performance difference is not incremental. It is transformational.

Steve Morrissey | steve@beperpetual.com | beperpetual.com

about perpetual:

Perpetual is a team effectiveness and organizational design consultancy working with leadership teams across consumer goods and beyond. Our t3® framework and diagnostic are trusted by organizations committed to building high-performance cultures that execute.

Perpetual:  •  Executive Search  •  Leadership Development  •  Advisory  •  beperpetual.com

See more insights
organizational health

AGILE EXECUTION: adapting under pressure

Agile execution. The ability to execute. In today’s VUCA world, planning takes on new forms. Organizations recognize that within weeks of initiating any plan, it can become, at worst, useless. In the best case, intentions remain on track, but how...

organizational health, Perpetual insights

the power of the offsite: a conversation on getting retreats right

An interview about a leadership offsite with Steve Morrissey, CEO & Founder of Perpetual, and Perpetual Partners Nigel Robinson and Duke Maines why a leadership offsite is worth it Every leadership team eventually asks the same question: is the leadership...

organizational health

BELONGING: the culture that holds high-performing teams together

Simon Sinek famously argued that people do not buy what you do, they buy why you do it. The same is true of the organizations people choose to join, stay in, and give their best to. The most capable talent...

organizational health, Perpetual insights

why high-performing teams still need time together?

At Perpetual, we spend our days inside leadership teams, assessing them, building them and coaching them into high-performing teams. Across every industry we work in, from wine & spirits and food & beverage to beauty and consumer goods, one pattern...